The Supreme Court has upheld the drug smuggling conviction of Delilah Diaz, a California woman, in a 6-3 decision. The ruling was based on expert testimony that criminal gangs rarely use “blind mules” to transport drugs across the southern border. Diaz had argued that the expert’s testimony was unfair and illegal as it implied her knowledge of the drugs hidden in her car. However, the justices determined that the expert’s testimony about drug smuggling operations in general did not violate federal rules of evidence.
Diaz, a U.S. citizen, was stopped at a border crossing in August 2020 when returning from Mexico. During the inspection, Border Patrol agents discovered 56 packages of methamphetamine concealed in the car’s door panels and trunk, weighing over 54 pounds with an estimated retail value of $368,550. Diaz claimed that the car belonged to her boyfriend and she had no knowledge of the drugs.
To prove Diaz’s knowledge of the drugs, prosecutors called Andrew Flood, a Department of Homeland Security special agent, who testified that drug traffickers generally do not entrust large quantities of drugs to individuals who are unaware they are transporting them. Diaz was subsequently convicted of drug trafficking and sentenced to seven years in prison.
The Supreme Court’s decision affirmed the conviction, with Justice Clarence Thomas stating that the expert’s testimony did not violate federal rules as it did not express an opinion about Diaz herself knowingly transporting methamphetamine. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justices Samuel A. Alito Jr., Brett M. Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett, and Ketanji Brown Jackson joined in the majority opinion.
In dissent, Justice Neil M. Gorsuch expressed concern over the potential for prosecutors to use expert testimony to speculate on a defendant’s mental state. Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan also dissented.
This ruling sets a precedent allowing prosecutors to present expert testimony on the mental state of defendants in federal criminal trials. Critics argue that this could lead to the manipulation of jurors’ perceptions and undermine the fairness of the judicial process.
A regional court in Busan, South Korea, has announced that a man who stabbed South…
NEW YORK -- In a tragic incident on Thursday evening, a suspected drunk driver plowed…
A tragic incident unfolded at Fashion Island, a shopping mall in Newport Beach, as a…
A person is currently in custody following a disturbing incident in Huntington Beach on Thursday…
An armed individual who was making unspecified threats at Yellowstone National Park died in an…
Accused sex trafficker Andrew Tate, who is awaiting trial on rape and human trafficking charges,…
View Comments
This decision by the Supreme Court is absolutely appalling. It is disheartening to see that a majority of the justices have upheld the drug smuggling conviction of Delilah Diaz. This decision only perpetuates the flawed and unjust nature of our criminal justice system.
It is deeply concerning that the Court has chosen to prioritize punishment over rehabilitation. Instead of considering the circumstances and potential underlying issues that may have led Diaz to engage in drug smuggling, they have simply chosen to throw her behind bars.
Furthermore, the fact