Six Glendale Police Officers Cited for Evidence Mishandling, Charges Dropped in Criminal Case

Six sworn officers from the Glendale Police Department have been cited for violating department policy in the handling of evidence, leading to charges being dropped in one criminal case, according to an internal investigation report obtained by The Denver Post. The city also revealed that charges were not pursued in another case due to the policy violations. The Arapahoe County Sheriff’s Office is currently conducting an external investigation into the matter.

The allegations against the Glendale officers involve the disposal of various pieces of evidence related to multiple criminal cases that occurred in February. The discarded items include license plates, methamphetamine, cocaine, and a counterfeit $50 bill.

In one incident on February 13, officers responding to a suspected scooter theft discarded a backpack belonging to the suspect in a garbage pail at the evidence intake room. Inside the backpack, a lieutenant discovered marijuana, folding knives, drug paraphernalia, and prescription pills. The following day, an officer brought a woman with outstanding warrants to the detention center, where she was found to be in possession of drugs and a counterfeit bill. The officer discarded the drugs and the counterfeit bill back at the police station. Additionally, the officer was cited for improperly having his wife in the patrol car during the apprehension, while three police sergeants were cited for allowing the improper ride-along.

The officers involved have not been criminally charged, and their names are not being disclosed by The Denver Post. Glendale City Manager Chuck Line emphasized that it was the city’s own law enforcement personnel who discovered the officers’ misconduct and alerted prosecutors. The police department has since implemented measures to prevent similar incidents, including additional training and increased surveillance cameras in the evidence intake area.

While Line acknowledged that some of the violations were minor, such as late filing of reports, he emphasized that the city takes the issue seriously. Line stated, “We can’t have cases where we’re confident someone committed a crime but can’t be prosecuted because there were errors in the case.” He also emphasized the importance of ensuring that the officers’ conduct does not violate the constitutional rights of suspects.

In a press release, Glendale stated that, apart from the two cases where charges were dropped or not pursued, their internal investigation found no other compromised cases due to the officers’ conduct.

CrimeDoor
Author: CrimeDoor

2 Responses

  1. This post highlights a real-world example of the importance of proper evidence handling in law enforcement. The case of the Glendale Police Department officers serves as a reminder of the potential consequences that can arise from violating department policies regarding evidence. In this specific instance, charges had to be dropped in a criminal case due to mishandling of evidence by the officers involved.

    This situation underscores the significance of maintaining the integrity of evidence throughout the entire criminal justice process. Proper evidence handling is crucial to ensure fairness, accuracy,

  2. In my own experience, I witnessed a similar case of mishandling evidence by law enforcement officers. I live in a small town where the police force is relatively small, and incidents like this are rare. However, there was one incident that caught the attention of the entire community.

    A local business owner was accused of theft after a significant amount of money went missing from a neighboring store. The police conducted an investigation and gathered evidence, including surveillance footage and witness statements. The accused individual vehemently denied the

Leave a Reply

Share on:

[mailpoet_form id="1"]

Subscribe to Our Newsletter