Prosecutors Push for April 15 Start of Donald Trump’s Hush Money Trial, Dismiss Defense’s Delay Claims

Prosecutors Push for April 15 Start of Donald Trump’s Hush Money Trial, Dismiss Defense’s Delay Claims

New York prosecutors are urging Judge Juan M. Merchan to commence the criminal trial of former President Donald Trump on April 15, dismissing the defense’s calls for further delays or dismissal of the case as a “red herring.” Prosecutors argue that the recent evidence dump, which the defense claims hindered their preparations, is largely immaterial or duplicative of previously disclosed evidence. Out of the more than 100,000 pages of evidence from a previous federal investigation, only around 270 documents are relevant to Trump’s case and had not been previously shared with his lawyers.

The trial, which would be the first of a former U.S. president, was initially scheduled to begin on Monday but was postponed until mid-April due to the late arrival of evidence. On Monday, Judge Merchan will hold a hearing to determine responsibility for the late evidence, assess any potential harm caused, and consider whether sanctions are warranted. Trump, who has pleaded not guilty, is expected to attend the hearing.

The evidence includes records related to Trump’s former lawyer and key prosecution witness, Michael Cohen, who was imprisoned as a result of the federal probe. Trump’s lawyers claim that some of this evidence could be exculpatory and favorable to the defense. Prosecutors argue that most of it pertains to Cohen’s unrelated federal convictions but acknowledge that it could be used to challenge Cohen’s credibility.

While Trump’s lawyers have requested a 90-day delay, they have also asked for the case to be dismissed, alleging prosecutorial misconduct and violations of evidence-sharing rules. The Manhattan district attorney’s office did not oppose a 30-day delay but intends to fight any further attempts to postpone the trial. Prosecutors argue that the defense’s allegations are unfounded and that the evidence-sharing rules only apply to material in their possession, not evidence held by outside parties like the U.S. attorney’s office.

Trump’s defense has also sought to delay the trial until after the Supreme Court rules on his claims of presidential immunity, which they argue could apply to some of the allegations and evidence in the hush money case. The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments on April 25.

The hush money case revolves around allegations that Trump falsified his company’s records to conceal payments made to Cohen, who paid porn actor Stormy Daniels $130,000 during the 2016 presidential campaign to suppress her claims of an extramarital sexual encounter with Trump. Trump has denied the encounter and pleaded not guilty to 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. His lawyers maintain that the payments to Cohen were legitimate legal expenses and not part of any cover-up.

Cohen, who worked for Trump for a decade, turned against him in 2018 and pleaded guilty to campaign finance violations, making false statements on a bank loan application, tax evasion related to his taxi industry investments, and lying to Congress. After serving approximately a year in prison, Cohen was released to home confinement due to the COVID-19 pandemic. He is expected to be a key prosecution witness against Trump, while Trump and his lawyers argue that Cohen is untrustworthy.

Author: CrimeDoor

3 Responses

  1. to deny bail for Harvey Weinstein, the disgraced Hollywood producer who was convicted of sexual assault and rape. The prosecutors argue that Weinstein is a flight risk and a danger to society, pointing to his vast wealth and history of intimidating and silencing his victims. They also highlight the numerous allegations against him, suggesting that there may be more victims who have yet to come forward.

    In my opinion, denying bail for Weinstein is the right decision. Given his resources and connections, there is a real possibility that he

  2. Here are some additional tips and strategies related to the topic discussed in the post:

    1. Research and gather evidence: If you are involved in a legal case, it is crucial to thoroughly research and gather all the necessary evidence to support your case. This includes collecting documents, witness statements, and any other relevant information that can help strengthen your argument.

    2. Consult with legal experts: It is always advisable to consult with legal experts, such as attorneys or legal advisors, who can provide you with professional guidance

Leave a Reply

Share on:

[mailpoet_form id="1"]

Subscribe to Our Newsletter