Prosecution Continues to Call Witnesses in Trump Hush-Money Trial

Prosecution Continues to Call Witnesses in Trump Hush-Money Trial

The fourth week of the criminal trial involving former President Donald Trump and the alleged hush-money payment to adult film star Stormy Daniels concluded on Friday in New York. The prosecution continued to present witnesses, aiming to strengthen its case that Trump intentionally falsified business documents to influence the 2016 election outcome. Trump faces 34 felony counts related to the alleged payment.

One of the key witnesses on Friday was Madeleine Westerhout, a former White House aide who served as a personal assistant to Trump. Westerhout testified about Trump receiving envelopes with cheques to sign, but under cross-examination, she faced questions about her knowledge of the specific business matters Trump was attending to. Trump’s defense lawyer also inquired about whether Trump signed documents without reviewing them, to which Westerhout responded affirmatively. She also confirmed that Trump was concerned about the impact of rumors regarding his alleged affair with Daniels on his family, supporting the defense’s argument that Trump aimed to protect his family from embarrassment.

Following Westerhout’s testimony, four technical witnesses took the stand. Compliance analysts Daniel Dixon from AT&T and Jenne Tomalin from Verizon authenticated phone records related to key figures in the trial, including Allen Weisselberg. Two paralegals from the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office, Georgia Longstreet and Jaden Jarmel-Schneider, presented evidence such as social media posts, text messages, and data collected from Michael Cohen’s phone.

During breaks in witness testimony, the prosecution sought to introduce a 1999 interview between Trump and Larry King as evidence. However, the defense argued that the interview’s relevance to events in 2016, when campaign finance laws had changed, was limited. Judge Juan Merchan sided with the defense, deeming the interview “too attenuated” due to the significant time gap.

Another matter addressed in court was Michael Cohen’s presence on TikTok, where he has been critical of Trump. The defense requested a separate gag order against Cohen, citing concerns that Trump was unable to respond to Cohen’s statements while Cohen continued to speak out. Judge Merchan issued a warning to the prosecution, instructing them to inform Cohen that he should refrain from making further statements about Trump.

The court proceedings concluded with the prosecution indicating that it anticipated calling two more witnesses before potentially resting its case. The trial is expected to continue next week, with a midweek break on Wednesday and Trump’s requested absence on Friday to attend his son Barron’s graduation.

Author: CrimeDoor

1 Response

  1. This post highlights the ongoing criminal trial involving former President Donald Trump and the alleged hush-money payment to adult film star Stormy Daniels. This case has significant implications for the field of law and politics. It serves as a real-world application of the legal principles surrounding campaign finance laws and potential violations by public figures.

    The trial provides an opportunity to examine the intricacies of campaign finance regulations and their enforcement. It allows legal professionals, scholars, and the general public to witness how these laws are applied in practice

Leave a Reply

Share on:

[mailpoet_form id="1"]

Subscribe to Our Newsletter