Migrants arrested on gun charges have been released without bail, shedding light on the ongoing squatting crisis in the city. This alarming development serves as a case study on the erosion of our law enforcement system (“Loose cannons,” April 3). The accused individuals, who were reportedly involved in acts of violence, drug-related activities, and general lawlessness, have been set free without any bail, despite the charges being eligible for it. The presiding judge overruled the district attorney’s request for bail, releasing six of the defendants back onto the streets.
This decision not only fails to protect the public but also emboldens these individuals to continue their criminal activities. The release of these miscreants undermines our sense of safety and order, creating further chaos in our communities. The judge responsible for this decision should be held accountable for their failure to prioritize the well-being of the community.
The squatting crisis in New York City has reached a point where police often dismiss it as a “civil matter,” allowing squatters to remain in place (“Loose cannons,” April 3). Landlords are forced to endure months of legal battles, during which they collect no rent while incurring attorney fees, just to regain possession of their own properties. This laissez-faire attitude towards squatting is a direct consequence of the city’s flawed squatters’ rights law, which comes into effect after a mere 30 days.
It is the duty of politicians to protect citizens and their property, but they seem to be captured by misguided ideologies from the liberal left. It is high time for them to abandon the woke train and prioritize the safety and well-being of law-abiding citizens (“Loose cannons,” April 3). A better solution must be found to address the squatting crisis and prevent further harm to innocent individuals.
In a separate incident, pro-Palestine protesters disrupted Easter Mass at St. Patrick’s Cathedral, displaying a complete lack of respect for a sacred religious gathering (“Mass-hysteria at St. Patrick’s,” April 1). This act of protest, which marred a peaceful event, is unacceptable. While individuals have the right to protest, they should not disrupt religious traditions that hold deep significance for many.
It is worth considering how such an invasion of a major mosque during religious services would be condemned as Islamophobic and disrespectful to a place of worship (“Mass-hysteria at St. Patrick’s,” April 1). Freedom of religion is a fundamental pillar of American greatness, as well as the rule of law. The protesters who invaded St. Patrick’s Cathedral on a day sacred to Catholics clearly do not value this right, which is enshrined in the Constitution.
