Legal experts are closely monitoring the case of Karen Read, as her defense lawyers claim that the jurors had reached a unanimous decision to acquit her of murdering her cop-boyfriend before a mistrial was declared. The case, which unfolded in a Massachusetts courtroom, is now heading into uncharted territory as lawyers seek a ruling on this unprecedented situation.
According to attorney Mike Thaler, the jury had been discharged without reaching an official verdict on any of the charges. Thaler’s firm, located just blocks away from the Dedham courthouse where the trial took place, is representing Read. The defense alleges that all 12 jurors had agreed on Read’s innocence regarding second-degree murder and leaving the scene of a fatal crash, but were deadlocked on the manslaughter charge. Since then, five jurors have come forward with similar claims.
Read’s lawyers are now requesting that the supposed not-guilty verdict on the two charges be honored, leading to her acquittal. However, with no official verdict and a hung jury, prosecutors have vowed to retry Read on all charges. The defense argues that a verdict can only be reached in the courtroom, and since the jury has been discharged, there is no longer a pending trial.
The situation is considered bizarre, as the jury’s notes during deliberation sessions had indicated a deadlock, without any indication of a partial verdict. The defense claims that the jurors were unaware of the possibility of partial verdicts and did not expect a mistrial to be declared abruptly after their last note to Judge Beverly Cannone.
Legal experts, including Massachusetts criminal lawyer Michael DelSignore, believe that if the defense’s claims can be substantiated, Judge Cannone should dismiss the charges against Read. DelSignore emphasizes the community’s perception of a potential cover-up and urges the judge to demonstrate impartiality by honoring a potential “not guilty” verdict.
The case revolves around Read’s alleged involvement in the death of her boyfriend, John O’Keefe, during a drunken argument in January 2022. Read’s defense contends that she was framed and that O’Keefe was actually beaten to death by his police colleagues during a fight that night. The sensational claims surrounding the case have fueled public interest, particularly due to questionable behavior by investigators and individuals close to the case.
DelSignore suggests that the alleged misconduct by law enforcement has already weakened the prosecution’s case. He proposes that prosecutors consider dismissing the murder charge and focus solely on retrying Read for manslaughter, as it would serve the interest of justice.
2 Responses
If you’re interested in learning more about the legal concept of mistrials and how they can impact a case, I recommend checking out this article from LegalMatch titled “Understanding Mistrials in Criminal Cases.” It provides a comprehensive overview of mistrials, including the reasons they may occur and the potential consequences for both the prosecution and the defense. It’s a great resource for anyone wanting to delve deeper into the legal aspects of the Karen Read case.
This is absolutely outrageous! How can a mistrial be declared when the jurors had already reached a unanimous decision to acquit Karen Read? It is clear that justice is being denied in this case. The legal system is supposed to ensure fairness and protect the rights of the accused, but it seems like a mockery of justice is taking place here.
If the jurors had already made up their minds and found Karen Read not guilty, then why was a mistrial declared? This decision undermines the credibility of the entire