Dublin Jury Begins Deliberations in Trial of Jozef Puska Accused of Murdering Teacher Ashling Murphy

Jozef Puska, 33, in the dock at the Central Criminal Court in Dublin.

In Dublin, the jury at the Central Criminal Court has commenced deliberations in the case of Jozef Puska, 33, accused of the murder of Ashling Murphy, a 23-year-old school teacher. The incident occurred on January 12 last year while Ms. Murphy was exercising on a canal path in Tullamore, Co Offaly. Puska, from Lynally Grove in Mucklagh, Tullamore, has pleaded not guilty to the charge.

Judge Mr. Justice Tony Hunt emphasized the need for a clinical and analytical approach, devoid of emotions, in the jury’s decision-making process. Puska, in his testimony, claimed he was attempting to aid Ms. Murphy after she was allegedly attacked by another man, who also assaulted him.

The judge outlined to the jury that if they find Puska’s narrative credible or see a reasonable possibility in his version, they should acquit him, labeling him a victim of crime and circumstance. However, if they believe his account does not stand up to scrutiny and that the prosecution has effectively countered it, they must deliberate on what that signifies.

To convict Puska of murder, the jury must be convinced beyond reasonable doubt that he inflicted the fatal neck wounds on Ms. Murphy with intent to kill or cause serious injury. Although the option of manslaughter was mentioned, it was deemed an “academic possibility,” with neither party advocating for it.

The judge guided the jury through key evidence aspects, including an alleged confession by Puska in a Dublin hospital, DNA evidence under Ms. Murphy’s fingernails, Puska’s response to police interrogations, his admitted lies to the Garda, and eyewitness accounts from the attack day.

Puska’s comments to gardai in the hospital, where he allegedly confessed to the murder, were scrutinized, considering the context of his medical condition and surroundings. The jury was advised to assess the reliability of this admission. The judge also addressed the DNA evidence, noting its high probability of matching Puska but warning against the fallacy of equating DNA match likelihood with guilt.

Justice Hunt highlighted the significance of inferences from Puska’s failure to answer specific questions during police interviews. The jury was reminded that these inferences alone could not sustain a guilty verdict but could corroborate other evidence against the accused.

The judge also focused on eyewitness testimony, particularly Jenna Stack’s account, who was jogging nearby during the incident. Her testimony, including a misidentification of the attacker, was put into context with the common errors in criminal cases involving eyewitness identification.

The judge reminded the jury to consider Puska’s actions post-incident, including burning his clothes and shaving his beard, and to critically analyze his explanations for these actions.

The jury, which began its deliberations in the afternoon, was adjourned to resume the next morning, with Judge Hunt indicating further directions would be provided. The jury requested transcripts of Puska’s testimony, as well as that of eyewitnesses Ms. Stack and Ms. Marron, for their deliberations.

darian
Author: darian

Leave a Reply

Share on:

[mailpoet_form id="1"]

Subscribe to Our Newsletter